Talk:Diamond-mos notation: Difference between revisions
CompactStar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) m ArrowHead294 moved page Talk:Diamond–MOS notation to Talk:Diamond-mos notation over redirect |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Special status of diatonic == | == Special status of diatonic == | ||
I wanted to know, why does diatonic use standard notation (ABC, #/b) while non-diatonic uses different notation ( | I wanted to know, why does diatonic use standard notation (ABC, #/b) while non-diatonic uses different notation (JKL, &/@)? It can't be for distinctiveness purposes because everything non-diatonic uses identical notation. So if a lot of MOSes will be sharing the same notation anyway, we could use the "ABC" notation for both diatonic and non-diatonic MOS to avoid people having to learn new note names and accidentals. After all, this notation is said to attempt to "keep new symbols and memorization required to a minimum." | ||
There are also other places where 5L 2s has a different treatment in this notation, like allowing equalized and collapsed for diatonic but not other MOSes. | |||
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 19:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 19:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | ||