Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
| Line 429: | Line 429: | ||
:: Thank you again for your help :) And Happy Holidays as well :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | :: Thank you again for your help :) And Happy Holidays as well :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:: | :: … | ||
::: | :: I am posting this update for a general audience rather than for Fredg999 specifically: While not strictly part of this same topic, I removed stub boxes from EDO pages bigger than 1000 for the same reasons that were discussed here: ("''In general, stuff like stub and todo templates should be placed while taking into consideration the importance of the page, so it's expected that narrower topics have shorter pages, including very specific intervals with fewer applications; those can be expanded at any time, of course, but we don't necessarily need a flashing light pointing to them''"). | ||
:: | :: If it happens that any of the specific edo pages I removed stub from actually is important to a bunch of other pages, then of course anyone can feel free to add the stub box back to those specific ones. I just suspect that for more of them than not, they probably didn’t need the stub box, considering their step size is way way below the just noticeable difference and some were even marked as novelties. | ||
:: | :: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 19:15, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::: I have concluded the survey now, and based on the results, come up with these guidelines: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Optional guidelines for interval page todo categories]]. (Survey results included in that page too.) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | :: … | ||
:: It is now Jan 1 Sydney time so I’m going ahead with Solution A, and with the survey. Please vote in the survey here: [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScFzn4u5FR-QXm4FYf1UOmIzcIj9AHV6NGFdzSvwvUYvcnMxw/viewform?usp=dialog ''Survey about interval pages in Todo:expand and Stubs'' - Google Forms]. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 23:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:: … | |||
:: I have concluded the survey now, and based on the results, come up with these guidelines: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Optional guidelines for interval page todo categories]]. XW:IntTodo for short. (Survey results included in that page too.) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:: … | |||
:: Over the past 24 hours, I have gone through all pages in Category:Rational intervals, and ensured they are all in the correct categories according to XW:IntTodo. For unclear edge cases, I just left them how they are and didn’t change them. It ended up being that by far most pages were already in the correct categories anyway, so I didn’t have to change very much. | |||
:: Since the guidelines are optional, no one really needs to think or worry about them moving forwards, they are just there if anyone wants them as an aid to guide decision making. They helped me though, I feel much more satisfied now, knowing that there’s at least a loose system behind what page goes where :) | |||
:: Thank you to everyone who helped in this process, especially Fredg999 for the earlier comment that set me on this path. | |||
:: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 23:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||