Talk:352/351: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 16:

::::: I hope the new sagittal notation section adequately addresses the original question. [[User:Dave Keenan|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan|talk]]) 13:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

:::::: Right, but now I wonder if something has recently changed. Since when did the downward version become the "main" Sagittal accidental? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

::::::: No, nothing has changed in that respect. I wonder how you got that impression. I recently added a bunch of new sections to comma pages about their use in Sagittal. Maybe you only happened to see the ones where the sagittal was pointing downward? This happens about half of the time, because it's more important for the comma's 2,3-free form to be superunison than it is for the comma itself. So in this case, when speaking of the 13/11k, we look at the ratio 351/352 = ('''13''' * 3³) / ('''11''' * 2⁵). It also happens this way for the 5C, because it's the 80/81 form where the 5 is in the numerator. But if you look at the 11M, for an example of the other type, it's the 33/32 form where both the 2,3-form and the comma itself are super together, when the 11 is in the numerator and 33 > 32.

::::::: Ah, but I see that Dave heard your concern too and already went around to all the pages we worked on already and added the other sagittal direction. Hope these together help to clarify. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ::::: I hope the new sagittal notation section adequately addresses the original question. [[User:Dave Keenan|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan|talk]]) 13:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
+:::::: Right, but now I wonder if something has recently changed. Since when did the downward version become the "main" Sagittal accidental? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
+::::::: No, nothing has changed in that respect. I wonder how you got that impression. I recently added a bunch of new sections to comma pages about their use in Sagittal. Maybe you only happened to see the ones where the sagittal was pointing downward? This happens about half of the time, because it's more important for the comma's 2,3-free form to be superunison than it is for the comma itself. So in this case, when speaking of the 13/11k, we look at the ratio 351/352 = ('''13''' * 3³) / ('''11''' * 2⁵). It also happens this way for the 5C, because it's the 80/81 form where the 5 is in the numerator. But if you look at the 11M, for an example of the other type, it's the 33/32 form where both the 2,3-form and the comma itself are super together, when the 11 is in the numerator and 33 > 32.
+::::::: Ah, but I see that Dave heard your concern too and already went around to all the pages we worked on already and added the other sagittal direction. Hope these together help to clarify. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)