Xenharmonic Wiki:Cross-platform dialogue: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:34, 3 October 2024 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 2,289 edits reply to sintel abt badness ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:38, 3 October 2024 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 2,289 edits reply to sintel abt badness Newer edit →
Line 367:		Line 367:
	:[[User:Sintel\|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 21:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [copypasta from facebook]		:[[User:Sintel\|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 21:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [copypasta from facebook]

	:: Why not just penalize it so that [subgroup].p has increasing badness for increasing complexity of p? Or if that leads to a strange normalizer for whatever reason, why not just have all [subgroup].p have equivalent badness assuming that p is unconstrained in all of them? I don't think "the exact normalizer expression that would make all extensions equal badness assuming everything else stays the same" is arbitrary. --18:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)		:: Why not just penalize it so that [subgroup].p has increasing badness for increasing complexity of p? Or if that leads to a strange normalizer for whatever reason, why not just have all [subgroup].p have equivalent badness assuming that p is unconstrained in all of them? I don't think "the exact normalizer expression that would make all extensions equal badness assuming everything else stays the same" is arbitrary. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 18:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)