153edt: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:24, 26 August 2024 view source Lériendil (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Sysops 7,596 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:25, 26 August 2024 view source Lériendil (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Sysops 7,596 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	In the no-twos [[7-limit]], 153edt supports [[canopus]] temperament, which gives it a rather accurate approximation of the 5th harmonic; and it additionally is accurate in the [[11-limit]], tempering out the comma [[387420489/386683451]] in the 3.7.11 subgroup. Harmonics 19 and 29 are also notably good.		In the no-twos [[7-limit]], 153edt supports [[canopus]] temperament, which gives it a rather accurate approximation of the 5th harmonic; and it additionally is accurate in the [[11-limit]], tempering out the comma [[387420489/386683451]] in the 3.7.11 subgroup. Harmonics 19 and 29 are also notably good.

			However, 153edt's approximation of [[2/1]] is close to maximally bad, meaning that it is as far from an octave-equivalent tuning that an [[EDT]] of this size can be (though by this point, it is only 6 or so cents off).