Talk:Schismic–Pythagorean equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Wouldn't it be good to have a k = n - 1 option to equate this to a Syntonic-Pythagorean equivalence continuum, the same way the syntonic-chromatic equivalence continuum has a k = n - 2 option? This is because the Pythagorean comma will not be directly relevant for most temperaments that are not multiples of 12EDO, but the syntonic comma has wide relevance, both as a comma and as a musical interval in its own right. <small>unsigned contribution by: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]], 6:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)</small> | Wouldn't it be good to have a k = n - 1 option to equate this to a Syntonic-Pythagorean equivalence continuum, the same way the syntonic-chromatic equivalence continuum has a k = n - 2 option? This is because the Pythagorean comma will not be directly relevant for most temperaments that are not multiples of 12EDO, but the syntonic comma has wide relevance, both as a comma and as a musical interval in its own right. <small>unsigned contribution by: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]], 6:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)</small> | ||
: For what it's worth, the Pythagorean comma not only has relevance as the difference between, say, C# and Db, but it has functions as a musical interval in its own right, much like the syntonic comma. That said, I can see what you're talking about otherwise --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | : For what it's worth, the Pythagorean comma not only has relevance as the difference between, say, C# and Db, but it has functions as a musical interval in its own right, much like the syntonic comma. That said, I can see what you're talking about otherwise. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | ||