Talk:1025/1024: Difference between revisions
m →Kilobytisma is not a good name.: typo |
→Kilobytisma is not a good name.: add emphasis on there being strong reasons to rename |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Kilobytisma is not a good name. == | == Kilobytisma is not a good name. == | ||
Not only because the "[[kilobyte comma]]" (another bad name) is obviously [[128/125]] = 1024/1000 but also because this comma should be named something based on its musical implication, which is also quite obvious so it's honestly sort of puzzling to me that it wasn't named something based on the fact that it's equal to ([[41/32]])/([[32/25]]), representing an essentially-tempered supermajor augmented triad type possibility. I strongly suggest either the "supermajor ambiharmonisma" or the "supermajor augmented comma"/"augmented supermajor comma". --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 14:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC) | Not only because the "[[kilobyte comma]]" (another bad name) is obviously [[128/125]] = 1024/1000 but also because this comma should be named something based on its musical implication, which is also quite obvious so it's honestly sort of puzzling to me that it wasn't named something based on the fact that it's equal to ([[41/32]])/([[32/25]]), representing an essentially-tempered supermajor augmented triad type possibility. I strongly suggest either the "supermajor ambiharmonisma" or the "supermajor augmented comma"/"augmented supermajor comma". --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 14:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
In other words, there are [[Temperament_naming#Temperament_and_comma_naming_conventions|strong reasons]] for renaming this comma. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 15:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC) | |||