Neji: Difference between revisions
m the example used is somewhat confusing; "equal division of the octave" conveys the same information as if you added "pitch"; rather it's the way in which you divide the pitch that is of importance. also the term "target scale" for example is important in understanding the nature of the construction Tag: Undo |
→Detempering: Focused on just the “detempering” section only, since I’m already happy with how the rest of the page looks and I’m happy to leave it well enough alone. Put the emphasis on “has” instead of “scale logic”, because “has” vs “follows” is the important distinction the reader’s eye needs to be drawn to, not “scale logic” vs “scale logic”. Removed the exclamation mark because the sentence it ends does not need such intense emphasis. |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
A more ([[JI subgroup]]) lattice-based approach is [[detempering]]. Detempering entails that the neji has the property of being [[epimorphic]] (obeys the appropriate mapping logic) with respect to a [[regular temperament]] for a tempered scale, equal-division or otherwise. | A more ([[JI subgroup]]) lattice-based approach is [[detempering]]. Detempering entails that the neji has the property of being [[epimorphic]] (obeys the appropriate mapping logic) with respect to a [[regular temperament]] for a tempered scale, equal-division or otherwise. | ||
Importantly and nontrivially, detempering is stricter than merely requiring that the target scale has | Importantly and nontrivially, detempering is stricter than merely requiring that the target scale ''has'' a scale logic (that is, a [[mapping]]). Even if the target scale has a mapping, a neji may approximate it without following its associated mapping. A detempering, however, must ''follow'' the mapping. | ||
=== Building edo nejis === | === Building edo nejis === | ||