Talk:Subgroup temperaments: Difference between revisions

CompactStar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Sintel (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:


== Clarification needed ==
== Clarification needed ==
Why is there "clarification needed" on CTE generators of some 3/2-repeating temperaments? I had calculated the data for them using sintel's temperament calculator so the generators should be correct.
Why is there "clarification needed" on CTE generators of some 3/2-repeating temperaments? I had calculated the generators using sintel's temperament calculator so they should be correct.
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 23:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 23:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
: There's the distinction of subgroup CTE vs inharmonic CTE for fractional subgroup temperaments. If you happen to know which scheme is used in sintel's calculator feel free to clarify. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
:: By comparing Sintel's calculator and x31eq, I have confirmed Sintel's calculator uses subgroup ''TE''. It is very likely Sintel's calculator is consistent in using subgroup tuning for both TE and CTE, but I cannot confirm this because x31eq does not show CTE.
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 07:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
::: Alright. That's a good reason to believe it's subgroup CTE. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
:::: Just want to confirm that the calculator indeed does subgroup TE for both cases. - [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]])
Return to "Subgroup temperaments" page.