User:VIxen/Temperament proposals: Difference between revisions
m →Kibi: forgot to change to 103h at one place |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) "optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Extensions to higher limits, perhaps 31-limit at least, seem possible but will require using blocks of 82 notes corresponding to the 103h val. | Extensions to higher limits, perhaps 31-limit at least, seem possible but will require using blocks of 82 notes corresponding to the 103h val. | ||
Data for equave 2/1 is provided below for compatibility. The TE error is small enough - 0. | Data for equave 2/1 is provided below for compatibility. The TE error is small enough - 0.011 cents/octave - but the complexity of most intervals involving powers of 2 is high like in ennealimmal, which makes the badness high. | ||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19 | Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19 | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~266/165 | Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~266/165 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 29g, 74g, 103h, 132degh, 222cdeefgh, 251eh, 354, 486g, 737, 840 }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 1.78 × 10<sup>-3</sup> | [[Badness]]: 1.78 × 10<sup>-3</sup> | ||