37th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

Eliora (talk | contribs)
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 14: Line 14:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 703.3903
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 703.3903


{{Val list|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.312105
[[Badness]]: 0.312105
Line 27: Line 27:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0355
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0355


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 37, 74, 111 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }}


Badness: 0.101001
Badness: 0.101001
Line 40: Line 40:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0520
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0520


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 37, 74, 111 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }}


Badness: 0.048732
Badness: 0.048732
Line 55: Line 55:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~24000/16807 = 612.4003
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~24000/16807 = 612.4003


{{Val list|legend=1| 37, 222b, 259b, 296, 629 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 222b, 259b, 296, 629 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.784746
[[Badness]]: 0.784746
Line 68: Line 68:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~768/359 = 612.4003
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~768/359 = 612.4003


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 37, 259b, 296, 629 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 259b, 296, 629 }}


Badness: 0.167327
Badness: 0.167327
Line 81: Line 81:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~462/325 = 612.4206
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~462/325 = 612.4206


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 37, 259b, 296, 629f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 259b, 296, 629f }}


Badness: 0.076183
Badness: 0.076183
Line 94: Line 94:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~121/85 = 612.4187
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~121/85 = 612.4187


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 37, 259b, 296, 629f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 259b, 296, 629f }}


Badness: 0.052475
Badness: 0.052475