37th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) "optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 703.3903 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 703.3903 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.312105 | [[Badness]]: 0.312105 | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0355 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0355 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }} | ||
Badness: 0.101001 | Badness: 0.101001 | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0520 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0520 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }} | ||
Badness: 0.048732 | Badness: 0.048732 | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~24000/16807 = 612.4003 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~24000/16807 = 612.4003 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 222b, 259b, 296, 629 }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.784746 | [[Badness]]: 0.784746 | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~768/359 = 612.4003 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~768/359 = 612.4003 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 259b, 296, 629 }} | ||
Badness: 0.167327 | Badness: 0.167327 | ||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~462/325 = 612.4206 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~462/325 = 612.4206 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 259b, 296, 629f }} | ||
Badness: 0.076183 | Badness: 0.076183 | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~121/85 = 612.4187 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~121/85 = 612.4187 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 259b, 296, 629f }} | ||
Badness: 0.052475 | Badness: 0.052475 |