Talk:Prime number/WikispacesArchive

Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018 by WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia (Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW

All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page. All new discussion should go on Talk:Prime number.


Please, more 'precisione' in the redaction!

The wording of this page is not quite understandable. Please someone write better descriptions here said.

- Osmiorisbendi July 18, 2011, 01:46:51 PM UTC-0700


Which of the words or expressions would you consider not understandable?

- hstraub January 26, 2012, 12:58:29 AM UTC-0800


Perhaps we should explain these terms:

1. "composite", as used in the expression "For composite EDOs, ...", means "non-prime" (since any such number can be considered to be "composed" of its multiplicative factors; e.g. the composite integer 6 is the product of multiplying the prime numbers 2 and 3).

2. "co-prime": Two integers are co-prime if they have no common prime factors; e.g. 14 and 15 are co-prime since 14 has only the prime factors 2 and 7 whilst 15 has only the prime factors 3 and 5, so they share no common prime factor.

- YahyaA October 29, 2015, 06:06:21 PM UTC-0700


The terms "xenharmonician" and "ekmelician" are surely incomprehensible to most people, including many of our readers. (What DOES that second word mean?!)

- YahyaA October 29, 2015, 06:09:24 PM UTC-0700


Return to "Prime number/WikispacesArchive" page.