Talk:Middle Path table of eleven-limit rank two temperaments/WikispacesArchive

Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018 by WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia (Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW

All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page. All new discussion should go on Talk:Middle Path table of eleven-limit rank two temperaments.


Editing

Is it OK if I edit this?

- genewardsmith December 28, 2011, 12:24:26 PM UTC-0800


By all means.

Some of the ones with plus signs need new names, I believe. I chose the constant 42 for the badness formula because it gets miracle but not too much other stuff.

Feel free to change anything you like.

- keenanpepper December 28, 2011, 02:21:59 PM UTC-0800


Dang, I forgot to put mapping matrices or wedgies or anything on here, so you can't tell what temperaments the pluses stand for. I'll rectify that as soon as I can use an actual computer again.

- keenanpepper December 28, 2011, 02:24:53 PM UTC-0800


That was one of the things I was concerned about editing.

- genewardsmith December 28, 2011, 03:20:23 PM UTC-0800


This list depresses me, half the temperaments on it are worthless. I think I should add a larger list ordered by TE logflat badness sometime.

- genewardsmith December 28, 2011, 04:43:14 PM UTC-0800


You should do that for 5 and 7 limit too.

Out of curiosity, how many of the ones on the 7-limit list from A Middle Path do you consider worthless?

- keenanpepper December 28, 2011, 07:22:24 PM UTC-0800


Return to "Middle Path table of eleven-limit rank two temperaments/WikispacesArchive" page.