Microtonalists' critical reaction to a recovering microtonalist's critical reaction to Why Microtonality?

Revision as of 20:11, 29 July 2013 by Wikispaces>JlMoriart (**Imported revision 442714748 - Original comment: **)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES

This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:

This revision was by author JlMoriart and made on 2013-07-29 20:11:18 UTC.
The original revision id was 442714748.
The revision comment was:

The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.

Original Wikitext content:

This page is a reaction to the following:
[[A recovering microtonalist's critical reaction to Why Microtonality]]

=Mike's reaction to the above= 
There's only one reason you should ever pursue microtonality: **IF YOU THINK IT SOUNDS GOOD**

If you don't like the way it sounds, and you don't think it'll grow on you after spending enough time with it, **DON'T PURSUE MICROTONALITY.**

I, personally, love it so much that I'm driven to keep exploring and finding more and more new sounds. Who cares about the rest of this discussion?

Mike adds:
**6. It sounds good**

Keenan adds:
**7. You're interested in "Western historical tunings and non-Western traditional tunings" in the context of progressive or fusion music, but not the kind that homogenizes everything by forcing it into a 12edo framework.**

Original HTML content:

<html><head><title>Microtonalists critical reaction to a recovering microtonalists critical reaction to Why Microtonaltiy?</title></head><body>This page is a reaction to the following:<br />
<a class="wiki_link" href="/A%20recovering%20microtonalist%27s%20critical%20reaction%20to%20Why%20Microtonality">A recovering microtonalist's critical reaction to Why Microtonality</a><br />
<br />
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc0"><a name="Mike's reaction to the above"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:0 -->Mike's reaction to the above</h1>
 There's only one reason you should ever pursue microtonality: <strong>IF YOU THINK IT SOUNDS GOOD</strong><br />
<br />
If you don't like the way it sounds, and you don't think it'll grow on you after spending enough time with it, <strong>DON'T PURSUE MICROTONALITY.</strong><br />
<br />
I, personally, love it so much that I'm driven to keep exploring and finding more and more new sounds. Who cares about the rest of this discussion?<br />
<br />
Mike adds:<br />
<strong>6. It sounds good</strong><br />
<br />
Keenan adds:<br />
<strong>7. You're interested in &quot;Western historical tunings and non-Western traditional tunings&quot; in the context of progressive or fusion music, but not the kind that homogenizes everything by forcing it into a 12edo framework.</strong></body></html>