Ed5/3
IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:
- This revision was by author JosephRuhf and made on 2016-11-30 14:40:59 UTC.
- The original revision id was 601045712.
- The revision comment was:
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.
Original Wikitext content:
<span style="font-size: 19.5px;">Division of a sixth (e. g. 5/3 or 11/7) into n equal parts</span> Division of e. g. the 5:3 or the 11:7 into equal parts can be conceived of as to directly use this interval as an equivalence, or not. The question of [[equivalence]] has not even been posed yet. The utility of 5:3 or 11:7 or another sixth as a base though, is apparent by being named directly in the standard definition of such as the octave based [[Sensi|sensi]] temperament. Many, though not all, of these scales have a pseudo (false) octave, with various degrees of accuracy, but which context(s), if any, it is very perceptually important in is as yet an open question.
Original HTML content:
<html><head><title>edVI</title></head><body><span style="font-size: 19.5px;">Division of a sixth (e. g. 5/3 or 11/7) into n equal parts</span><br /> <br /> <br /> Division of e. g. the 5:3 or the 11:7 into equal parts can be conceived of as to directly use this interval as an equivalence, or not. The question of <a class="wiki_link" href="/equivalence">equivalence</a> has not even been posed yet. The utility of 5:3 or 11:7 or another sixth as a base though, is apparent by being named directly in the standard definition of such as the octave based <a class="wiki_link" href="/Sensi">sensi</a> temperament. Many, though not all, of these scales have a pseudo (false) octave, with various degrees of accuracy, but which context(s), if any, it is very perceptually important in is as yet an open question.</body></html>