Talk:Defactoring terminology proposal: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:: I have slightly edited the statement you disagree with to make it less strongly opposed to your perspective, but I otherwise stand by it in this context. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 19:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC) | :: I have slightly edited the statement you disagree with to make it less strongly opposed to your perspective, but I otherwise stand by it in this context. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 19:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
::: Torsion refers specifically to the structure of a module. That is, the module has torsion when some of its elements have finite order (they are cyclic subgroups). By the way you're wording things, it seems like defactoring refers to properties of the matrices involved. That way it's fine though: "enfactored mapping" and "enfactored comma basis" are clear enough. | |||
::: Surely you're not claiming the work you've done on exterior algebra is basic! I guess I'm not always sure what level of depth/complexity an article should fall on. I do think it's possible to explain 'advanced' concepts clearly, as you have certainly demonstrated. | |||
:::- [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 22:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC) | |||