Talk:Patent val/Properties: Difference between revisions

Line 26:

:::: I suppose. But if we branch RTT partially on a terminological basis and then Dave and I use "uniform map" on our branch, that would force a new page anyway because we think of things the opposite way, with "integer uniform maps" ("patent vals") being a specific type of "uniform maps" ("generalized patent vals"). This is as I proposed here: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:Patent_val#alternative_proposal:_add_new_page_for_uniform_map. If we break the pages up, that changes the hierarchization so that it's not within a page but across a page, so that both ways of approaching the concept can be realized straightforwardly. Anyway, so perhaps we just revisit this issue once I send the survey out to the community about RTT branching and get the results back. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

::::: Alright, per discussion [[Talk:Patent_val#Thoughts_on_changing_.22patent_val.2C.22_and_other_terminology_changes_in_general|here]], I will not be allowed to add "uniform map" to the "patent val" page, so the way forward for our conceptualization of this problem will be a new page covering uniform map, integer uniform map, and simple map. I suppose I have nothing further to say here about this page. Except perhaps that it might be slightly less confusing if in the introduction, it was clearer that this is still the place to discuss properties of "patent val", though at this time there is only discussion of properties of GPVs. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:08, 8 November 2021 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,171 edits →Page is only about GPVs? ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 18:21, 18 November 2021 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,171 edits →Page is only about GPVs?
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:::: I suppose. But if we branch RTT partially on a terminological basis and then Dave and I use "uniform map" on our branch, that would force a new page anyway because we think of things the opposite way, with "integer uniform maps" ("patent vals") being a specific type of "uniform maps" ("generalized patent vals"). This is as I proposed here: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:Patent_val#alternative_proposal:_add_new_page_for_uniform_map. If we break the pages up, that changes the hierarchization so that it's not within a page but across a page, so that both ways of approaching the concept can be realized straightforwardly. Anyway, so perhaps we just revisit this issue once I send the survey out to the community about RTT branching and get the results back. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 22:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)		:::: I suppose. But if we branch RTT partially on a terminological basis and then Dave and I use "uniform map" on our branch, that would force a new page anyway because we think of things the opposite way, with "integer uniform maps" ("patent vals") being a specific type of "uniform maps" ("generalized patent vals"). This is as I proposed here: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:Patent_val#alternative_proposal:_add_new_page_for_uniform_map. If we break the pages up, that changes the hierarchization so that it's not within a page but across a page, so that both ways of approaching the concept can be realized straightforwardly. Anyway, so perhaps we just revisit this issue once I send the survey out to the community about RTT branching and get the results back. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 22:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

			::::: Alright, per discussion [[Talk:Patent_val#Thoughts_on_changing_.22patent_val.2C.22_and_other_terminology_changes_in_general\|here]], I will not be allowed to add "uniform map" to the "patent val" page, so the way forward for our conceptualization of this problem will be a new page covering uniform map, integer uniform map, and simple map. I suppose I have nothing further to say here about this page. Except perhaps that it might be slightly less confusing if in the introduction, it was clearer that this is still the place to discuss properties of "patent val", though at this time there is only discussion of properties of GPVs. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 18:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)