Normal forms: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
extract RREF from Mathematical theory of regular temperaments#Characterizing a regular temperament, because it is a subtopic of the Normal list characterization listed there
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
link comma-basis
Line 1: Line 1:
Since a [[regular temperament]] can be represented by multiple equivalent [[Vals and tuning space|val]] lists (aka [[mapping]]s) or [[Monzos and interval space|monzo]] lists (aka comma-bases), it can be helpful — e.g. when comparing or cataloguing temperaments — to choose a single one of these equivalent lists to use as its unique identifier. A set of rules that are consistently able to narrow the full set of equivalent lists down to a single list for each temperament may be called a ''normal form'', and accordingly, a list which uniquely identifies a temperament in this way may be called a '''normal list'''.  
Since a [[regular temperament]] can be represented by multiple equivalent [[Vals and tuning space|val]] lists (aka [[mapping]]s) or [[Monzos and interval space|monzo]] lists (aka [[comma-basis|comma-bases]]), it can be helpful — e.g. when comparing or cataloguing temperaments — to choose a single one of these equivalent lists to use as its unique identifier. A set of rules that are consistently able to narrow the full set of equivalent lists down to a single list for each temperament may be called a ''normal form'', and accordingly, a list which uniquely identifies a temperament in this way may be called a '''normal list'''.  


Because several different normal forms have been developed, each temperament has several different normal lists: one for each form. These normal lists are not all necessarily different; sometimes some or all of them may be the same.
Because several different normal forms have been developed, each temperament has several different normal lists: one for each form. These normal lists are not all necessarily different; sometimes some or all of them may be the same.