Talk:Interior product: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) →Questions, observations, suggestions: add summary table |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
I don't have a strong preference which way people want to go with this information. And certainly some combination of these recommendations could be done. I am very open to hearing that there are cases where interior product does exactly what you want and regressive wouldn't cut it. I haven't gone through every use on the wiki (and outside it) to check. Also there's the argument that this interior product defined as it is has been around for a while and maybe even if it has some issues we should preserve it for backwards compatibility. All fine. | I don't have a strong preference which way people want to go with this information. And certainly some combination of these recommendations could be done. I am very open to hearing that there are cases where interior product does exactly what you want and regressive wouldn't cut it. I haven't gone through every use on the wiki (and outside it) to check. Also there's the argument that this interior product defined as it is has been around for a while and maybe even if it has some issues we should preserve it for backwards compatibility. All fine. | ||
If it's of any assistance, I've implemented all of these products in Wolfram Language | If it's of any assistance, I've implemented all of these products in Wolfram Language: https://github.com/cmloegcmluin/VEA | ||
And here's a summary table that has helped me get my head around this situation: | And here's a summary table that has helped me get my head around this situation: | ||