Douglas Blumeyer's RTT How-To: Difference between revisions
→maps: technically wrong to shorten vectors because then they live in a different space - need the 0s |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) m →intro: hopefully superior solution for unicode stars |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|- | |- | ||
!practicality | !practicality | ||
| | |★★★★ | ||
| | |★★★ | ||
| | |★ | ||
|- | |- | ||
!harmonic accuracy | !harmonic accuracy | ||
| | |★ | ||
| | |★★★ | ||
| | |★★★★ | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
As for whether ''determining'' an RTT tuning is any harder than determining an ED or JI tuning, I think it would be fair to say that in the exact same way that an RTT tuning — once attained — combines the strengths of ED and of JI, determining an RTT tuning combines the challenges of determining good ED tunings and of determining good JI tunings. You have been warned. | As for whether ''determining'' an RTT tuning is any harder than determining an ED or JI tuning, I think it would be fair to say that in the exact same way that an RTT tuning — once attained — combines the strengths of ED and of JI, determining an RTT tuning combines the challenges of determining good ED tunings and of determining good JI tunings. You have been warned. | ||
== maps == | == maps == | ||