User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 211:

:::::::::::::::: I'm sure that "Connectivity" will be not understood by most users. Paradoxically, using the word "Paradiatonic" is pretty good for the use in a name/title. I can explain it. I assume people playing on such exotic instruments usually know both "para-" and "diatonic", so they will read the entire word. It's not a problem that the entire word is totally unknown, it can only boost curiosity. Some well-known word like "connectivity" implies very many meanings, and this is what can puzzle people and can be perceived as faceless. (Why did you mention 7/4? You don't have it in your scales on this page. This is one of the intervals I really want to have, in some, well, totally non-diatonic systems.) Anyway, thank you for another idea. I would greatly appreciate some more.

~~<br/>~~For your information, I'm much less of an idea generator and much more of a one who discovers ideas brought by other people. It happened many time when some person could not realize the value of her/his own idea and I was the one to discover it. :-) [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::: For your information, I'm much less of an idea generator and much more of a one who discovers ideas brought by other people. It happened many time when some person could not realize the value of her/his own idea and I was the one to discover it. :-) [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::: But first of all, I am interested to know if you agree with my statement that you can mix fragments with different scales in one music piece? Sorry in this concern looks either too trivial to you, or not clear.

@@ Line 211: / Line 211: @@
 :::::::::::::::: I'm sure that "Connectivity" will be not understood by most users. Paradoxically, using the word "Paradiatonic" is pretty good for the use in a name/title. I can explain it. I assume people playing on such exotic instruments usually know both "para-" and "diatonic", so they will read the entire word. It's not a problem that the entire word is totally unknown, it can only boost curiosity. Some well-known word like "connectivity" implies very many meanings, and this is what can puzzle people and can be perceived as faceless. (Why did you mention 7/4? You don't have it in your scales on this page. This is one of the intervals I really want to have, in some, well, totally non-diatonic systems.) Anyway, thank you for another idea. I would greatly appreciate some more.
-<br/>For your information, I'm much less of an idea generator and much more of a one who discovers ideas brought by other people. It happened many time when some person could not realize the value of her/his own idea and I was the one to discover it. :-) [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::::::::: For your information, I'm much less of an idea generator and much more of a one who discovers ideas brought by other people. It happened many time when some person could not realize the value of her/his own idea and I was the one to discover it. :-) [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 :::::::::: But first of all, I am interested to know if you agree with my statement that you can mix fragments with different scales in one music piece? Sorry in this concern looks either too trivial to you, or not clear.