User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 206:

::::::::::::: To be frank, it would be better for the instrument name to not reference me, as I don't want to accidentally claim credit for something that's not completely original. Given the selection of pitches we want for this keyboard (which I mention below), we probably need to come up with a name for this keyboard based on the properties of those intervals- something like "Connectivity Microtonal Keyboard" would suffice, since we want more than just the diatonic scales. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::: This is also perfectly fine. It won't prevent me from crediting your work in an article and/or the product credits (unless we decide to get in some collaboration to do some joint work). But then, why "Connectivity" and why not "Diatonic"? Here is the thing: "we want" is not a sufficient reason, the work should not claim any more than it actually does. At this stage it ''has'' to be bound to "microtonal diatonic". If it goes beyond that, there are legitimate ways to reflect this fact: 1) re-naming of the product or just some title information, 2) adding new product... [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::: This is also perfectly fine. It won't prevent me from crediting your work in an article and/or the product credits (unless we decide to get in some collaboration to do some joint work). But then, why "Connectivity" and why not "Diatonic"? Here is the thing: "we want" is not a sufficient reason, the work should not claim any more than it actually does. At this stage, it ''has'' to be bound to "microtonal diatonic". If it goes beyond that, there are legitimate ways to reflect this fact: 1) re-naming of the product or just some title information, 2) adding new product or a component... [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::: But first of all, I am interested to know if you agree with my statement that you can mix fragments with different scales in one music piece? Sorry in this concern looks either too trivial to you, or not clear.

@@ Line 206: / Line 206: @@
 ::::::::::::: To be frank, it would be better for the instrument name to not reference me, as I don't want to accidentally claim credit for something that's not completely original.  Given the selection of pitches we want for this keyboard (which I mention below), we probably need to come up with a name for this keyboard based on the properties of those intervals- something like "Connectivity Microtonal Keyboard" would suffice, since we want more than just the diatonic scales. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
-:::::::::::::: This is also perfectly fine. It won't prevent me from crediting your work in an article and/or the product credits (unless we decide to get in some collaboration to do some joint work). But then, why "Connectivity" and why not "Diatonic"? Here is the thing: "we want" is not a sufficient reason, the work should not claim any more than it actually does. At this stage it ''has'' to be bound to "microtonal diatonic". If it goes beyond that, there are legitimate ways to reflect this fact: 1) re-naming of the product or just some title information, 2) adding new product... [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::::::: This is also perfectly fine. It won't prevent me from crediting your work in an article and/or the product credits (unless we decide to get in some collaboration to do some joint work). But then, why "Connectivity" and why not "Diatonic"? Here is the thing: "we want" is not a sufficient reason, the work should not claim any more than it actually does. At this stage, it ''has'' to be bound to "microtonal diatonic". If it goes beyond that, there are legitimate ways to reflect this fact: 1) re-naming of the product or just some title information, 2) adding new product or a component... [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 :::::::::: But first of all, I am interested to know if you agree with my statement that you can mix fragments with different scales in one music piece? Sorry in this concern looks either too trivial to you, or not clear.