No edit summary
clarity
Line 82: Line 82:
tl:dr version of Jason Scott's article: '''The productive contributors leave because they go from "being a content creator to being a content ''defender''."'''.. When a very few people shit all over everything, and admins don't stop them, because admins don't want to be "mean." And usually a few editors jump in and tell the people trying to make things work that they're being "mean."   
tl:dr version of Jason Scott's article: '''The productive contributors leave because they go from "being a content creator to being a content ''defender''."'''.. When a very few people shit all over everything, and admins don't stop them, because admins don't want to be "mean." And usually a few editors jump in and tell the people trying to make things work that they're being "mean."   


Or the editors and admins think a wiki is a democracy. When they should think of it as private property jointly owned by the admins and editors who are currently making useful edits.  
Or the editors and admins think a wiki is a democracy. When they should think of it as private property jointly owned by the admins and editors who have made useful edits.  
<hr />  
<hr />  
'''WANT TO CHAT WITH ME?''': Like many microtonal musicians, and many musicians in general, and many synth players, and most software designers, I have [[wikipedia:Asperger_syndrome|Aspergers]].  
'''WANT TO CHAT WITH ME?''': Like many microtonal musicians, and many musicians in general, and many synth players, and most software designers, I have [[wikipedia:Asperger_syndrome|Aspergers]].