5L 3s: Difference between revisions

CompactStar (talk | contribs)
I am not sure where I should put this section, I've put it in approaches for now
CompactStar (talk | contribs)
Line 175: Line 175:
* [[5L 3s/Temperaments]]
* [[5L 3s/Temperaments]]


== 5L 3s as diatonic with a fifth sharper than 5edo ===
== 5L 3s as diatonic with a fifth sharper than 5edo ==
You may have heard how [[2L 5s]] can be viewed as diatonic ([[5L 2s]]) generated by a fifth flatter than [[7edo]], in which case the large and small steps flip sizes. Similar to that, 5L 3s can be viewed as diatonic generated by a fifth sharper than [[5edo]]. To understand how this works and how you suddenly get an extra small step, let's first start with fifths slightly flat of 5edo and 5edo's fifth itself.
You may have heard how [[2L 5s]] can be viewed as diatonic ([[5L 2s]]) generated by a fifth flatter than [[7edo]], in which case the large and small steps flip sizes. Similar to that, 5L 3s can be viewed as diatonic generated by a fifth sharper than [[5edo]]. To understand how this works and how you suddenly get an extra small step, let's first start with fifths slightly flat of 5edo and 5edo's fifth itself.


Line 184: Line 184:
But what happens if you were to make the fifth even sharper than 5edo's? Well now the small step is going to become even smaller than 0 cents, that is,  it will become negative in size. Let's try to create a major scale by stacking 28edo's 728.6-cent fifth, which is just slightly larger than 5edo's: 257.1-514.3-471.4-728.6-985.7-1242.9-1200. Now the so-called "major third" is ''larger'' than the "perfect fourth", and likewise for the "major seventh" being larger than the octave.
But what happens if you were to make the fifth even sharper than 5edo's? Well now the small step is going to become even smaller than 0 cents, that is,  it will become negative in size. Let's try to create a major scale by stacking 28edo's 728.6-cent fifth, which is just slightly larger than 5edo's: 257.1-514.3-471.4-728.6-985.7-1242.9-1200. Now the so-called "major third" is ''larger'' than the "perfect fourth", and likewise for the "major seventh" being larger than the octave.


Obviously it is quite nonsensical to have an octave-repeating scale with the notes out of order, so let's put these in order and octave-reduce the 1242.9-cent "major seventh" to 42.9 cents: 42.9-257.1-471.4-514.3-728.6-985.7-1200. This scale is now in order but it is not a MOS because there are 3 step sizes, because there is now the 42.9-cent small step, the 214.3-cent large step and a single 257.1-cent "extra large" step. If you want to turn it back into a MOS scale,  then the extra-large step can be simply split into one large step and one small step, which adds an extra note. This results in 28edo's oneirotonic scale, 42.9-257.1-300.0-514.3-728.6-771.4-985.7-1200. So the oneirotonic scale can be seen as essentially being the result of a diatonic scale with fifths even sharper than that of 5edo, just with some adjustments to make it back into a normal properly-ordered MOS scale.
Obviously it is quite nonsensical to have an octave-repeating scale with the notes out of order, so let's put these in order and octave-reduce the 1242.9-cent "major seventh" to 42.9 cents: 42.9-257.1-471.4-514.3-728.6-985.7-1200. This scale is now in order but it is not a MOS because there are 3 step sizes, because there is now the 42.9-cent small step, the 214.3-cent large step and a single 257.1-cent "extra large" step. If you want to turn it back into a MOS scale,  then the extra-large step can be simply split into one large step and one small step, which adds an extra note. This results in 28edo's oneirotonic scale, 42.9-257.1-300.0-514.3-728.6-771.4-985.7-1200. This approach will work for any fifth between 720 and 750 cents (the generator range of oneirotonic). So the oneirotonic scale can be seen as essentially being the result of a diatonic scale with fifths even sharper than that of 5edo, just with some adjustments to make it back into a normal properly-ordered MOS scale.


== Samples ==
== Samples ==