Optimal patent val: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>genewardsmith **Imported revision 235964558 - Original comment: ** |
Wikispaces>genewardsmith **Imported revision 235971014 - Original comment: ** |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | <h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | ||
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | ||
: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2011-06-11 | : This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2011-06-11 17:01:11 UTC</tt>.<br> | ||
: The original revision id was <tt> | : The original revision id was <tt>235971014</tt>.<br> | ||
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | : The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | ||
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q <= p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the [[POTE tuning]] and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d < 600/N, from which it follows that N < 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e < 600/N and so N < 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N < 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N. | To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q <= p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the [[POTE tuning]] and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d < 600/N, from which it follows that N < 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e < 600/N and so N < 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N < 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N. | ||
Below are tabulated some values. In each case an identifier which uniquely identifies the temperament in question is given. In the codimension one case, where the temperament is defined by a single comma, the comma is given and used as a name. In other cases, for a temperament of rank n, n independent are given. Normally this is by way of integers conjoined by ampersands, such as 2&10 for 7-limit pajara. This tells us we can use the 7-limit patent vals for 2 and 10 to define the temperament. In case n independent patent vals cannot be found, vals using the Keenan notation are given; this adjusts the nth prime mapping to its second-best value by appending the nth lower-case letter in alphabetical order. Thus, "12f" | Below are tabulated some values. In each case an identifier which uniquely identifies the temperament in question is given. In the codimension one case, where the temperament is defined by a single comma, the comma is given and used as a name. In other cases, for a temperament of rank n, n independent vals are given. Normally this is by way of integers conjoined by ampersands, such as 2&10 for 7-limit pajara. This tells us we can use the 7-limit patent vals for 2 and 10 to define the temperament. In case n independent patent vals cannot be found, vals using the Keenan notation are given; this adjusts the nth prime mapping to its second-best value by appending the nth lower-case letter in alphabetical order. Thus, "12f" adjusts a patent val for 12 in the 13-limit or above, for instance <12 19 28 34 42 44|, to <12 19 28 34 42 45| (which is actually a better mapping, and hence more useful for this purpose.) | ||
=5-limit rank two= | =5-limit rank two= | ||
Line 394: | Line 394: | ||
To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q &lt;= p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the <a class="wiki_link" href="/POTE%20tuning">POTE tuning</a> and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d &lt; 600/N, from which it follows that N &lt; 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e &lt; 600/N and so N &lt; 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N &lt; 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.<br /> | To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q &lt;= p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the <a class="wiki_link" href="/POTE%20tuning">POTE tuning</a> and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d &lt; 600/N, from which it follows that N &lt; 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e &lt; 600/N and so N &lt; 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N &lt; 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Below are tabulated some values. In each case an identifier which uniquely identifies the temperament in question is given. In the codimension one case, where the temperament is defined by a single comma, the comma is given and used as a name. In other cases, for a temperament of rank n, n independent are given. Normally this is by way of integers conjoined by ampersands, such as 2&amp;10 for 7-limit pajara. This tells us we can use the 7-limit patent vals for 2 and 10 to define the temperament. In case n independent patent vals cannot be found, vals using the Keenan notation are given; this adjusts the nth prime mapping to its second-best value by appending the nth lower-case letter in alphabetical order. Thus, &quot;12f&quot; | Below are tabulated some values. In each case an identifier which uniquely identifies the temperament in question is given. In the codimension one case, where the temperament is defined by a single comma, the comma is given and used as a name. In other cases, for a temperament of rank n, n independent vals are given. Normally this is by way of integers conjoined by ampersands, such as 2&amp;10 for 7-limit pajara. This tells us we can use the 7-limit patent vals for 2 and 10 to define the temperament. In case n independent patent vals cannot be found, vals using the Keenan notation are given; this adjusts the nth prime mapping to its second-best value by appending the nth lower-case letter in alphabetical order. Thus, &quot;12f&quot; adjusts a patent val for 12 in the 13-limit or above, for instance &lt;12 19 28 34 42 44|, to &lt;12 19 28 34 42 45| (which is actually a better mapping, and hence more useful for this purpose.)<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc0"><a name="x5-limit rank two"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:0 -->5-limit rank two</h1> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc0"><a name="x5-limit rank two"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:0 -->5-limit rank two</h1> |