User:Zhenlige/EDO impressions: Difference between revisions

Zhenlige (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Zhenlige (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
*...
*...
*[[26edo|26]]: A stack of [[7/4]]. Meantone but tuned terribly. Incomplete [[130edo]].
*[[26edo|26]]: A stack of [[7/4]]. Meantone but tuned terribly. Incomplete [[130edo]].
*[[27edo|27]]: Worse than both 12- and 22edo for 5-limit. It is distinct in 7-limit tho, but that is like thinking 0.1 is better represented as 1 than 0. There are beatings here and there. It really needs compression. The fact that [[53edo]] is good indicates that 26- and 27edo are probably bad.
*[[27edo|27]]: Worse than both 12- and 22edo for 5-limit. The fifth sucks. It is distinct in 7-limit tho, but that is like thinking 0.1 is better represented as 1 than 0. There are beatings here and there. It really needs compression. The fact that [[53edo]] is good indicates that 26- and 27edo are probably bad.
*...
*...
*[[31edo|31]]: Ideal for pure-octave [[meantone]], combining lots of 11-limit extensions in a single tuning. Also [[valentine]] and [[miracle]]. IMO the best meantone EDO. For other temperaments its flat fifth may be a drawback.
*[[31edo|31]]: Ideal for pure-octave [[meantone]], combining lots of 11-limit extensions in a single tuning. Also [[valentine]] and [[miracle]]. IMO the best meantone EDO. For other temperaments its flat fifth may be a drawback.