User talk:FloraC/Critique on Functional Just System: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Add title to my post |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
You can also mess around with interactive versions of these images using my [https://www.yacavone.net/fjs-explorer/ Custom FJS Explorer], where you can also set different values for the radius of tolerance. For example, [https://www.yacavone.net/fjs-explorer/?rotPreset=2 here] is a visualization using FloraC's proposed radius of tolerance. [[User:M-yac|M-yac]] ([[User talk:M-yac|talk]]) 22:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC) | You can also mess around with interactive versions of these images using my [https://www.yacavone.net/fjs-explorer/ Custom FJS Explorer], where you can also set different values for the radius of tolerance. For example, [https://www.yacavone.net/fjs-explorer/?rotPreset=2 here] is a visualization using FloraC's proposed radius of tolerance. [[User:M-yac|M-yac]] ([[User talk:M-yac|talk]]) 22:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Limiting fifthspan instead of radius of tolerance == | |||
It seems to me that the choice of the radius of tolerance is made so the names would not be based on augmented or diminished intervals. In that case, having a fixed radius of tolerance is a wrong approach. I suggest that, when we create a name for an interval, we base it on the closest perfect, major or minor interval, i. e. inverval with fifthspan between -5 (m2) and +5 (M7). This seems to achieve the idea of FJS better than a radius of tolerance. | It seems to me that the choice of the radius of tolerance is made so the names would not be based on augmented or diminished intervals. In that case, having a fixed radius of tolerance is a wrong approach. I suggest that, when we create a name for an interval, we base it on the closest perfect, major or minor interval, i. e. inverval with fifthspan between -5 (m2) and +5 (M7). This seems to achieve the idea of FJS better than a radius of tolerance. | ||