Equal-step tuning: Difference between revisions

Contribution (talk | contribs)
Contribution (talk | contribs)
Line 273: Line 273:
! rowspan="2" |Ratio divided
! rowspan="2" |Ratio divided
! colspan="3" |Number of divisions
! colspan="3" |Number of divisions
! rowspan="2" |s2
|-
|-
!Alpha
!Alpha
Line 282: Line 283:
|5
|5
|8
|8
|1
|-
|-
|2/1
|2/1
Line 287: Line 289:
|7
|7
|12
|12
|2
|-
|-
|5/3
|5/3
Line 292: Line 295:
|9
|9
|16
|16
|3
|-
|-
|3/2
|3/2
Line 297: Line 301:
|11
|11
|20
|20
|4
|-
|-
|7/5
|7/5
Line 302: Line 307:
|13
|13
|24
|24
|5
|-
|-
|4/3
|4/3
Line 307: Line 313:
|15
|15
|28
|28
|6
|}
|}


* We can describe the pattern as follow: Alpha division = 3 + index * 2; Beta division = 5 + index * 2; Gamma division = Alpha division + Beta division
* We can describe the pattern as follow: Alpha division = s2* 2 - 1; Beta division = s2 * 2 + 1; Gamma division = Alpha division + Beta division


* Alpha types flatten the smaller interval and sharpen the larger; Beta types do the reverse; Gamma types again flatten the smaller and sharpen the larger.
* Alpha types flatten the smaller interval and sharpen the larger; Beta types do the reverse; Gamma types again flatten the smaller and sharpen the larger.