Talk:Map of linear temperaments: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 What's the basis of this split? I'm afraid it introduces bias. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
-: The split was because it was difficult both read and edit the huge uninterrupted wall of table. The reasons multiples of 150c were chosen is because they are the only spots which have nice round numbers which aren't in the middle of any of the temperaments already listed (eg not breaking porcupine or tetracot or any other temperament
+: The split was because it was difficult both read and edit the huge uninterrupted wall of table. The reasons multiples of 150c were chosen is because they are the only spots which have nice round numbers which aren't in the middle of any of the temperaments already listed (eg not breaking porcupine or tetracot or any other temperament in half). Multiples of 200c would work too, but I went with 150c because that means each section is shorter thus more readable. But the choices were 150s or 200s. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 10:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
-in half). Multiples of 200c would work too, but I went with 150c because that means each section is shorter thus more readable. But the choices were 150s or 200s. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 10:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
 == ''Frost'' ==