Talk:History and philosophy of xenharmonic music: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 The usage of "xenharmonics" varies quite a bit from what Nick has specified. --[[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 22:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
-== Proposal to add to the TLDR section ==
+== If we do this then I'd be happy for this to be moved to main space ==
-@Nick Vuci, would you be happy to add this or something like it to the TLDR or some other prominent part of the page?
+If we expand the first line of the wiki main page to say to say "The Xenharmonic Wiki is an open resource for information about musical tuning. This information includes tuning systems and their relationships, theory, math and practice. This wiki covers both xenharmony and also broader tuning theory in general".
-"
+Then I would be happy for this article to be moved to main space in its current state without any changes, and I would be happy to sign it.
-Is it still okay to discuss - on the wiki, the Facebook, or the Discord - music that is microtonal, but not xenharmonic?
+--[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 02:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
-: '''Yes''', while the primary focus of the Xenharmonic Alliance is xenharmonic music, discussion and documentation of any non-12edo tuning, xen or not, is welcome.
-"
-If something like this is added, I would be happy to co-sign. I just want it to be made clear that discussion of any non-12 tunings in general is still welcome in XA spaces, not only xenharmonic tunings.
---[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 23:36, 26 September 2025 (UTC)