Talk:Path-based goodness: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Choice of parameter values needs justification == | == Choice of parameter values needs justification == | ||
What makes them canonical and what if different values are chosen. Otherwise the data are idiosyncratic and should be noted or kept to the user namespace. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:05, 10 August 2025 (UTC) | What makes them canonical and what if different values are chosen. Otherwise the data are idiosyncratic and should be noted or kept to the user namespace. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:05, 10 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
: I just addressed this. You can also see on [[User:hkm/Sandbox#Badness]] what happens if we increase inaccuracy_fondness up to 0.985--it starts to appreciate less accurate systems more, as one would expect. --[[User:Hkm|hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm|talk]]) 20:19, 17 August 2025 (UTC) | : I just addressed this. You can also see on [[User:hkm/Sandbox#Badness]] what happens if we increase inaccuracy_fondness up to 0.985--it starts to appreciate less accurate systems more, as one would expect. 72edo is still on top, which is part of why I gave path-based goodness a mention in the 72edo page. --[[User:Hkm|hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm|talk]]) 20:19, 17 August 2025 (UTC) | ||