User:BudjarnLambeth/Draft related tunings section: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:
* The selection of tunings should include at least one stretched tuning and at least one compressed tuning.
* The selection of tunings should include at least one stretched tuning and at least one compressed tuning.
* The most stretched tuning should have +15% to +25% relative error on prime 2, the most compressed should have -15 to -25%, and all the other tunings should cover a wide range of possible tunings in between.
* The most stretched tuning should have +15% to +25% relative error on prime 2, the most compressed should have -15 to -25%, and all the other tunings should cover a wide range of possible tunings in between.
=== Plan for roll-out ===
Edo pages which currently have  an "octave stretch", "related tunings", "zeta properties", etc. section:
* EDOS: {{EDOS|7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 22, 23, 31, 32, 33, 36, 39, 41, 42, 45, 54, 58, 59, 60, 64, 72, 99, 103, 111, 118, 125, 145, 152, 159, 166, 198, 212, 243, 247}}.
Highest priority pages:
* EDOS: {{EDOS|7, 12, 17, 19, 22, 31, 36, 41, 58, 72, 99, 103, 118, 152}}.
This standard will need to be rolled out to those above pages ''once this standard is ready''. (Not yet!!)
It can optionally be rolled out to more, other edo pages later.
When rolling it out try not to delete existing body text but instead rework it where possible.
When a "n-edo and octave stretch" page exists, this section will NOT replace that page. Still add this section to the relevant edo page, but also link to the "n-edo and octave stretch" page at the top of this section.
<br><br>
<br><br>