Zeta peak index: Difference between revisions

Line 8:

The Riemann zeta function is a mathematical function known for its relationship with the Riemann hypothesis, a 200-year old unsolved problem in mathematics. However, it also has a musical interpretation: the zeta function shows how "well" a given [[equal temperament]] approximates the no-limit [[just intonation]] relative to its size.

Zeta is not an objective metric: There are plenty of other metrics besides zeta for how "well" JI is approximated by an equal tuning, ~~such as [[mu badness]], [[target tuning|least squares tuning]], [[target tuning|minimax tuning]], and the many~~ [[:Category:Regular temperament tuning|optimised regular temperament tunings]] ~~when applied to [[rank]]-1 (i.e. equal) temperaments~~.

Zeta is not an objective metric: There are plenty of other metrics besides zeta for how "well" JI is approximated by an equal tuning, which you can find in: [[:Category:Regular temperament tuning|optimised regular temperament tunings]].

Zeta peaks are those equal-step tunings which the zeta function suggests should "well" approximate JI for this particular (not objective) definition of "well approximating". See the page [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning]] for a fuller explanation of how zeta peaks are arrived at.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 The Riemann zeta function is a mathematical function known for its relationship with the Riemann hypothesis, a 200-year old unsolved problem in mathematics. However, it also has a musical interpretation: the zeta function shows how "well" a given [[equal temperament]] approximates the no-limit [[just intonation]] relative to its size.
-Zeta is not an objective metric: There are plenty of other metrics besides zeta for how "well" JI is approximated by an equal tuning, such as [[mu badness]], [[target tuning|least squares tuning]], [[target tuning|minimax tuning]], and the many [[:Category:Regular temperament tuning|optimised regular temperament tunings]] when applied to [[rank]]-1 (i.e. equal) temperaments.
+Zeta is not an objective metric: There are plenty of other metrics besides zeta for how "well" JI is approximated by an equal tuning, which you can find in: [[:Category:Regular temperament tuning|optimised regular temperament tunings]].
 Zeta peaks are those equal-step tunings which the zeta function suggests should "well" approximate JI for this particular (not objective) definition of "well approximating". See the page [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning]] for a fuller explanation of how zeta peaks are arrived at.