History and philosophy of xenharmonic music: Difference between revisions
→Setting the Stage: small edit |
small formatting and grammar changes |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Like all such movements, the origins of xenharmonic music rest upon a convergence of trends in society. Three major forces laid this foundation: the standardization of 12-EDO as the default tuning system, alongside a growing awareness of tuning diversity; the broad shift in the 20th-century musical climate that unraveled and rewove the fabric of tonal tradition through its embrace of experimentation; and the rise of accessible technologies that empowered musicians to build instruments, explore new tuning systems, and form decentralized networks. | Like all such movements, the origins of xenharmonic music rest upon a convergence of trends in society. Three major forces laid this foundation: the standardization of 12-EDO as the default tuning system, alongside a growing awareness of tuning diversity; the broad shift in the 20th-century musical climate that unraveled and rewove the fabric of tonal tradition through its embrace of experimentation; and the rise of accessible technologies that empowered musicians to build instruments, explore new tuning systems, and form decentralized networks. | ||
By the end of the 19th century, 12-EDO had become the standard tuning system across Western music, embedded in instruments, notation, and education. It was often treated as a universal framework, leaving little room for alternatives. Around this same time, Hermann von Helmholtz published his immensely influential ''On the Sensations of Tone'', which Alexander John Ellis translated into English and expanded—nearly doubling its length. Where Helmholtz revealed the psychoacoustic and physical basis of just intonation, Ellis added a vast catalog of microtonal scales, making the book the leading authority on tuning for decades. Especially significant was Ellis's introduction of the | By the end of the 19th century, 12-EDO had become the standard tuning system across Western music, embedded in instruments, notation, and education. It was often treated as a universal framework, leaving little room for alternatives. Around this same time, Hermann von Helmholtz published his immensely influential ''On the Sensations of Tone'', which Alexander John Ellis translated into English and expanded—nearly doubling its length. Where Helmholtz revealed the psychoacoustic and physical basis of just intonation, Ellis added a vast catalog of microtonal scales, making the book the leading authority on tuning for decades. Especially significant was Ellis's introduction of the cent, which enabled precise comparison and documentation of tuning systems. In response to all this, musicians and theorists began revisiting just intonation, historical temperaments, and global tuning practices—each of which challenged the assumption of 12-EDO’s inevitability. The total standardization of 12-EDO, contrasted with a growing awareness of just intonation and tuning diversity, provided the conceptual foundation for the emergence of xenharmonic music. | ||
The 20th century also saw a broad shift away from traditional tonality in Western music. Movements such as atonality, serialism, minimalism, spectralism, and electronic music challenged established ideas of harmony, form, and instrumentation. While not always focused on tuning, these movements collectively represented and fostered a climate of experimentation in which the assumptions behind 12-EDO could be questioned, which in turn made the exploration of alternative tuning systems a viable and compelling path for composers. | The 20th century also saw a broad shift away from traditional tonality in Western music. Movements such as atonality, serialism, minimalism, spectralism, and electronic music challenged established ideas of harmony, form, and instrumentation. While not always focused on tuning, these movements collectively represented and fostered a climate of experimentation in which the assumptions behind 12-EDO could be questioned, which in turn made the exploration of alternative tuning systems a viable and compelling path for composers. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
=== Key Figures === | === Key Figures === | ||
Four figures stand out as especially foundational in the emergence of xenharmonics: | Four figures stand out as especially foundational in the emergence of xenharmonics: Harry Partch, Erv Wilson, George Secor, and Ivor Darreg. Their work helped define not only the theoretical and technical framework of xenharmonics, but also its philosophical identity. While many others have made significant contributions to the field, these four played particularly central roles in the core development of xenharmonic thought and practice. Therefore, for reasons of clarity and focus, this section focuses on them. | ||
==== Harry Partch ==== | ==== Harry Partch ==== | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Having explored the context and history of the term, let us summarize and clarify the definition: | Having explored the context and history of the term, let us summarize and clarify the definition: | ||
: '''''Xenharmonic''''' refers to music that '''clearly falls outside 12-tone equal temperament''', but ''isn’t'' traditional non-12 | : '''''Xenharmonic''''' refers to music that '''clearly falls outside 12-tone equal temperament''', but ''isn’t'' traditional non-12 music (tho it may take inspiration from them). It explores '''entirely new tonal structures beyond established frameworks'''. | ||
So now let's return to some of the questions and concerns that prompted this exploration. | So now let's return to some of the questions and concerns that prompted this exploration. | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
'''''<big>Detwelvulate—and long live the Xenharmonic Alliance!</big>''''' | '''''<big>Detwelvulate—and long live the Xenharmonic Alliance!</big>''''' | ||