Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Line 94: Line 94:
:::::: Sintel, I do think you were barking up the right tree with your second example, but we just need to find a better example along those same lines.  First example that comes to my mind is 31edo versus other quarter-comma meantone temperaments with only 31 notes and pure octaves. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::: Sintel, I do think you were barking up the right tree with your second example, but we just need to find a better example along those same lines.  First example that comes to my mind is 31edo versus other quarter-comma meantone temperaments with only 31 notes and pure octaves. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)


::::::: I have updated the minor varistions guideline so it now says the following:
::::::: I have updated the minor variations guideline so it now says the following:


* '''Minor variations''': Systems that differ only trivially from existing systems. For example, a meantone tuning with a fifth very close to quarter-comma meantone should not get its own page. It can be added to the existing tunings on the meantone page.  
* '''Minor variations''': Systems that differ only trivially from existing systems. For example, a meantone tuning with a fifth very close to quarter-comma meantone should not get its own page. It can be added to the existing tunings on the meantone page.  
Return to the project page "Notability guidelines".