Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions
Re minor variations etc |
→Minor variations, overly niche pages: Qualifications for the minor variations guideline |
||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
::: If both of the examples I could come up with weren't any good, then maybe it should just be removed. Though I do still believe, in general, if something is very closely related to an already existing page it is preferable to just add it there instead of making a new page. (And most temperament pages do come with a tuning spectrum, which does that job quite nicely.) | ::: If both of the examples I could come up with weren't any good, then maybe it should just be removed. Though I do still believe, in general, if something is very closely related to an already existing page it is preferable to just add it there instead of making a new page. (And most temperament pages do come with a tuning spectrum, which does that job quite nicely.) | ||
::: If you can think of a better way to phrase it then let me know (or edit the page!) – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | ::: If you can think of a better way to phrase it then let me know (or edit the page!) – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
:::: What you said has some merit, so I wouldn't want to get rid of it entirely, but adding some qualifiers (with examples) would be good to avoid confusion. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 22:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | |||