User:CompactStar/Ed16/9: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
m Todo
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''equal division of 16/9''' ('''ed16/9''') is a [[tuning]] obtained by dividing the [[16/9|Pythagorean minor seventh (16/9)]] in a certain number of [[equal]] steps. An ed16/9 can be generated by taking every other tone of an [[ed4/3]], so even-numbered ed16/9's are integer ed4/3's.  
The '''equal division of 16/9''' ('''ed16/9''') is a [[tuning]] obtained by dividing the [[16/9|Pythagorean minor seventh (16/9)]] in a certain number of [[equal]] steps. An ed16/9 can be generated by taking every other tone of an [[ed4/3]], so even-numbered ed16/9's are integer ed4/3's.  


Division of 16/9 into equal parts does not necessarily imply directly using this interval as an [[equivalence]]. The utility of 16/9 (or another seventh) as a base though, is apparent by being used at the base of so much modern tonal harmony.  
Division of 16/9 into equal parts does not necessarily imply directly using this interval as an [[equivalence]].  
 
The structural importance of 16/9 is suggested by its being the most common width for a [[tetrad]] in Western harmony, though it could be argued that this distinction belongs instead to [[7/4]] or [[9/5]] depending how one converts [[12edo|10\12]] into [[JI]].


{{Todo|inline=1|improve synopsis}}
{{Todo|inline=1|improve synopsis}}

Revision as of 01:42, 25 April 2025

The equal division of 16/9 (ed16/9) is a tuning obtained by dividing the Pythagorean minor seventh (16/9) in a certain number of equal steps. An ed16/9 can be generated by taking every other tone of an ed4/3, so even-numbered ed16/9's are integer ed4/3's.

Division of 16/9 into equal parts does not necessarily imply directly using this interval as an equivalence.

The structural importance of 16/9 is suggested by its being the most common width for a tetrad in Western harmony, though it could be argued that this distinction belongs instead to 7/4 or 9/5 depending how one converts 10\12 into JI.

Todo: improve synopsis