User talk:Hkm/Rankings: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
benyamind: Namoic: Chromacro. 3.7 | benyamind: Namoic: Chromacro. 3.7 | ||
benyamind: Namoic: Dreamer. 2 | |||
benyamind: Namoic: Hereninging. 3 | |||
benyamind: Namoic: Uradjinn. 3.5 | |||
benyamind: Progression in 16-tone equal temperament. 4.0 | benyamind: Progression in 16-tone equal temperament. 4.0 | ||
Line 49: | Line 55: | ||
Byrnes: Holocene Dream: Home. 2.25 | Byrnes: Holocene Dream: Home. 2.25 | ||
Byrnes: Holocene Dream: 27 EDO Etude. 2.2 | |||
don't love it | |||
Byrnes: Holocene Dream: Mesozoic. 2.3 | |||
byrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrnesbyrynesbyrnes | |||
budjarnlambeth why do you like byrnes so much | |||
i don't get it | |||
what do you see in this track | |||
the more i listen to byrnes the more i hear these little cliches that are | |||
omnipresent within his work | |||
i don't think i can take it anymore. | |||
so why a 2.3? one byrnes track is fine. what i'm doing now, which is listening to a bunch of byrnes all at once, is no fun at all. | |||
Byrnes: Holocene Dream: Out of the Sun. 2.5 | |||
Costa: Danse-Etude. 3.44 | Costa: Danse-Etude. 3.44 | ||
Line 78: | Line 99: | ||
E8 Heterotic: Glaukos Circuit. 0.31 | E8 Heterotic: Glaukos Circuit. 0.31 | ||
E8 Heterotic: No Threes for You. 1.88 | |||
fesh: It's a long way down... do you want to jump?: VII. and all the harvest shall rot. 4.69 | fesh: It's a long way down... do you want to jump?: VII. and all the harvest shall rot. 4.69 | ||
Line 85: | Line 108: | ||
groundfault: A New Dusk: Superior Intermedial. 4.25 | groundfault: A New Dusk: Superior Intermedial. 4.25 | ||
Heathwaite: Flarn Squared in 80edo. 2.3 | |||
It's a perfectly fine piece, which is why I don't want to give it a rating this low. It's just not top fifty percent for me. | |||
Hunt: Equal-Tempered Keyboard: Prelude in 14et. 3.12 | Hunt: Equal-Tempered Keyboard: Prelude in 14et. 3.12 | ||
Line 122: | Line 148: | ||
Byrnes does it better. | Byrnes does it better. | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||