Pitch class: Difference between revisions

Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
In terms of frequencies expressed in [[Hertz]], assuming a base frequency for middle C of 262 Hz, this would be {... 65.5, 131, 262, 524, 1028 ...}. In terms of midi note numbers, we can write it as {... 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 ...}.
In terms of frequencies expressed in [[Hertz]], assuming a base frequency for middle C of 262 Hz, this would be {... 65.5, 131, 262, 524, 1028 ...}. In terms of midi note numbers, we can write it as {... 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 ...}.


In a [[nonoctave]] xenharmonic system, an interval other than the octave might be used to define [[equivalence]]. For example, in [[Bohlen-Pierce]] tuning and other [[edt|equal divisions per tritave]], all pitches separated by a whole number of tritaves (3/1) may be considered equivalent.
In a [[nonoctave]] xenharmonic system, an interval other than the octave might be used to define [[equivalence]]. For example, in [[Bohlen–Pierce]] tuning and other [[edt|equal divisions per tritave]], all pitches separated by a whole number of tritaves (3/1) may be considered equivalent.


== See also ==
== See also ==