1ed86.4c: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Because 13.888 is not actually an integer, the scale that results does not actually include [[2/1]], so it is not a ''true'' [[edo]]. Instead it has a [[pseudo-octave]] almost 10 cents sharp, making it a “[[EDO#Non-integer EDO|non-integer edo]]”.
Because 13.888 is not actually an integer, the scale that results does not actually include [[2/1]], so it is not a ''true'' [[edo]]. Instead it has a [[pseudo-octave]] almost 10 cents sharp, making it a “[[EDO#Non-integer EDO|non-integer edo]]”.


13.888edo has been voted "monthly tuning" multiple times on the [[Monthly Tunings]] Facebook group, owing to its close approximations of many harmonics [[3/1]], [[7/1]] and [[11/1]].
13.888edo has been voted "monthly tuning" multiple times on the [[Monthly Tunings]] Facebook group, owing to its close approximations of many harmonics [[3/1]], [[7/1]], [[9/1]] and [[11/1]].


It is very close to [[Table of zeta-stretched edos|zeta-stretched 14edo]], a.k.a. [[42zpi]], which has a step size of 86.3¢.
It is very close to [[Table of zeta-stretched edos|zeta-stretched 14edo]], a.k.a. [[42zpi]], which has a step size of 86.3¢.