Talk:Helmholtz–Ellis notation: Difference between revisions
→23-limit vs syntonic comma arrows: (They look essentially the same except for attachment or lack of attachment to other symbols.) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I don't know if this is anything you can actually do anything about (if it's the actual standard, it's the actual standard), but those 23-limit comma arrows look EXTREMELY SIMILAR to single syntonic comma arrows, with the only discernable difference that the syntonic comma arrows are shown attached to other accidental symbols, whereas the 23-limit comma arrows are shown by themselves. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 22:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC) | I don't know if this is anything you can actually do anything about (if it's the actual standard, it's the actual standard), but those 23-limit comma arrows look EXTREMELY SIMILAR to single syntonic comma arrows, with the only discernable difference that the syntonic comma arrows are shown attached to other accidental symbols, whereas the 23-limit comma arrows are shown by themselves. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 22:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Typo in Latest revision as of 2024-11-19T14:22:59? == | |||
Latest revision says "[[File:Heji41.svg|54x54px]] is ''n'' a half-sharp, as [[File:Heji41.svg|54x54px]][[File:Heji41.svg|54x54px]]F is [[243/242|7.1¢]] flatter than F♯." (used to have ''not'' instead of ''n''). Is this a typo/copy-paste error? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 20:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||