The Riemann zeta function and tuning: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) m →Relationship to harmonic entropy: Missing parentheses |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
<math>\displaystyle{\left|\zeta\left(\frac{1}{2} + it\right)\right|^2 \cdot \overline {\phi(t)}}</math> | <math>\displaystyle{\left|\zeta\left(\frac{1}{2} + it\right)\right|^2 \cdot \overline {\phi(t)}}</math> | ||
is, up to a flip in sign, the Fourier transform of the unnormalized Harmonic Shannon Entropy for {{nowrap|''N'' {{=}} ∞}} | is, up to a flip in sign, the Fourier transform of the unnormalized Harmonic Shannon Entropy for {{nowrap|''N'' {{=}} ∞}}, where φ(''t'') is the characteristic function (aka Fourier transform) of the spreading distribution and {{overline|φ(''t'')}} denotes complex conjugation. | ||
Note that in the most common case where the spreading distribution is symmetric (as in the case of the Gaussian and Laplace distributions), the characteristic function is purely real and hence the conjugate is unnecessary. In particular, when the spreading distribution is a Gaussian, the characteristic function is also a Gaussian. | Note that in the most common case where the spreading distribution is symmetric (as in the case of the Gaussian and Laplace distributions), the characteristic function is purely real and hence the conjugate is unnecessary. In particular, when the spreading distribution is a Gaussian, the characteristic function is also a Gaussian. |