Complexity: Difference between revisions
CompactStar (talk | contribs) There is nothing prohibiting ultra-low badness temperaments from existing, it's just extremely rare |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) m Update links |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
In [[amity]], all of the lower-complexity intervals are more complex.<ref>[https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_19636.html Yahoo! Tuning Group | ''Complexity terminology wars'']</ref> | In [[amity]], all of the lower-complexity intervals are more complex.<ref group="note">[https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_19636.html Yahoo! Tuning Group | ''Complexity terminology wars'']</ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Note that the concept of complexity applies not only to [[rank-2 temperament]]s, but temperaments of any rank. For higher-rank temperaments, the lattice is a higher-dimensional space, so there could be different ways of measuring the area/volume/etc. that a chord takes up. | Note that the concept of complexity applies not only to [[rank-2 temperament]]s, but temperaments of any rank. For higher-rank temperaments, the lattice is a higher-dimensional space, so there could be different ways of measuring the area/volume/etc. that a chord takes up. | ||
See [[Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT | See [[Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT/Alternative complexities]] for an extensive discussion of interval complexity functions used in regular temperament theory. | ||
== Complexity measures == | == Complexity measures == | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
<references group="note" /> | |||
[[Category:Complexity| ]] <!-- | [[Category:Complexity| ]] <!-- Main article --> | ||