Survey of efficient temperaments by subgroup: Difference between revisions
m →Why you should use my favorite temperament (individual wiki editor opinions): Remove this section |
m →So, which temperaments should I use to make music?: made tone more formal |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
'''Xenharmonicist A''' might argue that an error less than | '''Xenharmonicist A''' might argue that an error less than ~15 [[cents]] on most intervals, and less than 5 cents on the really important ones (like the perfect fifth and the octave), is accurate enough. | ||
And they might argue that 25 notes per [[equave]] is the most that is practical, any more than that is too cumbersome. | And they might argue that 25 notes per [[equave]] is the most that is practical, any more than that is too cumbersome. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
'''Xenharmonicist B''' might argue that the error must be less than | '''Xenharmonicist B''' might argue that the error must be less than ~5 cents on almost all intervals, anything further out than that sounds out of tune to them. | ||
They might argue that it's perfectly possible to learn up to 50 notes per equave. | They might argue that it's perfectly possible to learn up to 50 notes per equave. | ||