|
|
| Line 300: |
Line 300: |
|
| |
|
| Only add temperaments if yourself, or at least a few other people, would recommend those temperaments. | | Only add temperaments if yourself, or at least a few other people, would recommend those temperaments. |
|
| |
| == Why you should use my favorite temperament (individual wiki editor opinions) ==
| |
|
| |
| In this section, '''any editor may create their own subheading, under which they may describe a specific temperament they like and why they think people should use it'''.
| |
|
| |
| Editors, ''please use simple, plain language'' as much as you can - imagine you're explaining this to a stranger at a bar who has no music theory knowledge at all, but is curious about it.
| |
|
| |
| Sort the explanations in alphabetical order (e.g. meantone, orwell, valentine).
| |
|
| |
| A single editor is allowed to add more than one temperament if they like. Multiple editors are also allowed to recommend the same temperament - it may be useful to readers to see multiple different editors’ perspectives on the same temperament to get a more full understanding of it.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| '''Note for readers:''' The following section of the page is a '''gallery of individual personal opinions'''. It is only here '''to give you a sampling of some of the many views''' of composers and theorists about specific temperaments. It is all opinion, not fact, you are free to take or discard any of it.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ;[[Orwell]] - ''recommended by [[User:BudjarnLambeth]] (2024)''
| |
| “I recommend orwell temperament because it has a good approximation of the full 11-limit, which includes all the JI intervals that I can easily hear and recognise, and it does so with a relatively small number of notes, about 22. (Though you can also go up to 31 notes to approximate the 11-limit even better.)”
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| (My entry in this section was just a placeholder to show how to format an entry. Once someone else adds an entry I will delete mine.)
| |
|
| |
|
| == I want a simpler, more straightforward overview == | | == I want a simpler, more straightforward overview == |