Survey of efficient temperaments by subgroup: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
How to read the table: Made text a little more formal
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Line 65: Line 65:


Some theorists believe including 13, 17 or higher in a subgroup is pointless because the brain can't register such complex intervals. Others believe these intervals are registered by the brain, maybe subtly and subconsciously in some instances, but still there.
Some theorists believe including 13, 17 or higher in a subgroup is pointless because the brain can't register such complex intervals. Others believe these intervals are registered by the brain, maybe subtly and subconsciously in some instances, but still there.


You may see the same temperament multiple times on the table if it is good at approximating multiple different subgroups. For example, magic is good at approximating both the 7-limit and the 11-limit, so it is listed under both.
You may see the same temperament multiple times on the table if it is good at approximating multiple different subgroups. For example, magic is good at approximating both the 7-limit and the 11-limit, so it is listed under both.