User:Dave Keenan/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Line 134:

(11)-EDO is in parenthesis because its fifth is so narrow it is usually notated as a subset of 22-EDO which has a good fifth.

To obtain the Evo notations, delete the multishaft symbols. There are no equivalent combinations with conventional sharps or flats, as limmas are conventionally notated as the intervals B-C and E-F. The multishaft symbols are not required, even in Revo notation; they merely allow for alternative spellings there. In theory, ~~conventional~~ sharps and flats ''could'' be used with the notations for 33, 40, and 47 because the sharp is one step for them, while it is zero or negative for the other rose EDOs and Sagittal never uses symbols for commas that have been tempered out or tempered negative. But Sagittal recommends not using sharps or flats, conventional or sagittal, with ''any'' limma-fraction notation.

To obtain the Evo notations, delete the multishaft symbols. There are no equivalent combinations with conventional sharps or flats, as limmas are conventionally notated as the intervals B-C and E-F. The multishaft symbols are not required, even in Revo notation; they merely allow for alternative spellings there. In theory, sharps and flats ''could'' be used with the notations for 33, 40, and 47 because the sharp is one step for them, while it is zero or negative for the other rose EDOs and Sagittal never uses symbols for commas that have been tempered out or tempered negative. But Sagittal recommends not using sharps or flats, conventional or sagittal, with ''any'' limma-fraction notation.

[[Category:Notation]]

[[Category:Sagittal notation]]

@@ Line 134: / Line 134: @@
 (11)-EDO is in parenthesis because its fifth is so narrow it is usually notated as a subset of 22-EDO which has a good fifth.
-To obtain the Evo notations, delete the multishaft symbols. There are no equivalent combinations with conventional sharps or flats, as limmas are conventionally notated as the intervals B-C and E-F. The multishaft symbols are not required, even in Revo notation; they merely allow for alternative spellings there. In theory, conventional sharps and flats ''could'' be used with the notations for 33, 40, and 47 because the sharp is one step for them, while it is zero or negative for the other rose EDOs and Sagittal never uses symbols for commas that have been tempered out or tempered negative. But Sagittal recommends not using sharps or flats, conventional or sagittal, with ''any'' limma-fraction notation.
+To obtain the Evo notations, delete the multishaft symbols. There are no equivalent combinations with conventional sharps or flats, as limmas are conventionally notated as the intervals B-C and E-F. The multishaft symbols are not required, even in Revo notation; they merely allow for alternative spellings there. In theory, sharps and flats ''could'' be used with the notations for 33, 40, and 47 because the sharp is one step for them, while it is zero or negative for the other rose EDOs and Sagittal never uses symbols for commas that have been tempered out or tempered negative. But Sagittal recommends not using sharps or flats, conventional or sagittal, with ''any'' limma-fraction notation.
 [[Category:Notation]]
 [[Category:Sagittal notation]]