User:BudjarnLambeth/Bird’s eye view of rank-2 temperaments: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 Some theorists believe including 13, 17 or higher in a subgroup is pointless because the brain can't register such complex intervals. Others believe these intervals are registered by the brain, maybe subtly and subconsciously in some instances, but still they matter. It is up to you which theorists you believe on that.
+You may see the same temperament multiple times on the table. Here’s why:
+Some temperaments are good at approximating a variety of different subgroups. For example, magic is good at approximating both the 7-limit and the 11-limit, so it is listed under both.
+It would be like if there were a table of pokemon, and one row said “cute pokemon”, and one row said “electric pokemon”: Pikachu would be listed under both.
@@ Line 277: / Line 283: @@
 (!) = ''It is unlikely that a useable temperament could exist here because there are too many important intervals to approximate with this number of notes.''
-'''Why does the same temperament appear multiple times?'''
-Some temperaments are good at approximating a variety of different subgroups. For example, magic is good at approximating both the 7-limit and the 11-limit, so it is listed under both.
-It would be like if there were a table of pokemon, and one row said “cute pokemon”, and one row said “electric pokemon”: Pikachu would be listed under both.
-This is like that.
 == Why you should use my favorite temperament (editor opinions) ==