User:BudjarnLambeth/Bird’s eye view of rank-2 temperaments: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 276: / Line 276: @@
 (!) = ''It is unlikely that a useable temperament could exist here because there are too many important intervals to approximate with this number of notes.''
-'''Why so many similar temperaments?'''
+'''Why does the same temperament appear multiple times?'''
-Some temperament names represent different but closely related tunings from a shared progenitor temperament, which should be noted when looking at higher-limit behaviours of more simple temperaments.
+Some temperaments are good at approximating a variety of different subgroups. For example, magic is good at approximating both the 7-limit and the 11-limit, so it is listed under both.
+It would be like if there were a table of pokemon, and one row said “cute pokemon”, and one row said “electric pokemon”: Pikachu would be listed under both.
+This is like that.
 == Why you should use my favorite temperament (editor opinions) ==