User:BudjarnLambeth/Bird’s eye view of rank-2 temperaments: Difference between revisions
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
'''Xenharmonicist A''' might argue that an error less than 15ish cents on most intervals, and less than 5 cents on the really important ones (like the perfect fifth and the octave), is accurate enough. | '''Xenharmonicist A''' might argue that an error less than 15ish [[cents]] on most intervals, and less than 5 cents on the really important ones (like the perfect fifth and the octave), is accurate enough. | ||
And they might argue that 25 notes per [[equave]] is the most that is practical, any more than that is too cumbersome. | And they might argue that 25 notes per [[equave]] is the most that is practical, any more than that is too cumbersome. | ||